Java: A platform for platforms
Sun's reorg may seem promising to shareholders but it's also a scramble for position. The question now is whether Sun can, or wants to, maintain its hold on Java technology. Especially with enterprise leaders like SpringSource and RedHat investing heavily in Java's future as a platform for platforms

Also see:

Discuss: Java: A platform for platforms?

Featured Whitepapers
Newsletter sign-up
View all newsletters

Sign up for our technology specific newsletters.

Enterprise Java
Email Address:

Java Kernel plan proceeds

The kernel formerly known as Java Browser Edition to be released in early 2008

  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • SlashDot
  • Stumble
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • dzone

SAN FRANCISCO (08/24/2007) - Sun continues to work on the Java Kernel, the idea of which is to provide a subset of the Java Runtime Environment tuned to particular programs.

Formerly known as Java Browser Edition, the Java Kernel is planned for release as part of Java Standard Edition (SE) 6 update 4, probably in early 2008, a Sun representative said on Friday. Developers will have early access to the code to provide feedback.

An original intent was to make Java like a Flash plug-in and enable a resurgence of Java on the browser. Applications would specify which features they need, such as Swing and XML parsing, said Sun staff engineer Ethan Nicholas, who is working on the project.

"The basic idea was that the current Java Runtime Environment is simply too big, and most programs require only a small subset of the functionality," Nicholas wrote in September 2006 on his blog. "The 'browser edition' that I suggested would enable you to install exactly the subset of Java that your particular program required, but you would be able to download all of the other functionality on demand (and thus be fully compatible with J2SE)."
Some Sun employees doubted the project would fly, according to Nicholas. Even a detailed analysis of the idea painted a bleak picture, he said.

"The feature did in fact get submitted as a proposal for Java 7 under the name "Java Kernel" (the idea being that you download a small "kernel" of Java functionality, which is in turn capable of downloading the rest of it)," Nicholas said.

Nicholas said he developed a stripped-down JRE installed containing only enough functionality to run "System.out.println," or "Hello World."

To determine which files were necessary for the project, Nicholas wrote a program to iterate through the JRE files.

"After going through all of the files in this fashion, I was left with an extremely minimal JRE that could run Hello World and ... well, that's about it. But it at least provided a starting point. Building a working installer from this JRE was itself a challenge because several of the files that weren't necessary to run Hello World were still necessary to successfully install the JRE, but I persevered and now have a fully functioning, minimal JRE," Nicholas said.

Comments about the project posted on Nicholas's blog varied.

"I also believe modularization of the JRE is the solution. Not just for the size of the download, but also for different other issues," one commenter said in 2006.

"The problem here is that Java isn't just a browser based technology, it's a platform. When I write a Java applet or application, I expect the platform to be there," said another respondent.


  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • SlashDot
  • Stumble
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • dzone
Comment
Login
Forgot your account info?
Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a JavaWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.
Resources

Read Ethan Nicholas's blog post "Java Browser Edition History" (Java.net, September 2006) to learn more about the origins of the Java Kernel.

Artima also did a nice interview with Ethan on this topic: "Ethan Nicholas on the Java Browser Edition" (Java Community News, September 2006).

Not everyone's a fan of the JBE: Read Ed Burnette's "Java Browser Edition: New name, wrong direction" (ZDNet, September 2006) for the view from the other side.

What do you think? Does a meaner, leaner Java platform stand a chance against Flash?